Rylei S., In re (2022) B316877 B316877; filed 7/18/22. ![[Files/CaseFiles/B316877.PDF]] [Opinion PDF](https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/B316877.PDF) ## Rule excerpts 2022 further-inquiry duty under Welfare and Institutions Code section 224.2(e), after reported possible Cherokee ancestry. > As discussed, that duty of further inquiry required interviewing, “as soon as practicable,” extended family members to develop specific biographical information, contacting the Bureau of Indian Affairs and “[c]ontacting the tribe or tribes and any other person that may reasonably be expected to have information regarding the child’s membership, citizenship status, or eligibility.” (§ 224.2, subd. (e)(2)(A)-(C).) — Rylei S., In re (2022) B316877, slip op., p. 12.