Osaze v. Aparicio-Gee (2026) A173403; filed 9/29/26. ![[Files/CaseFiles/A173403.PDF]] [Opinion PDF](https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/A173403.PDF) ## Rule excerpts > While trial courts need not provide extensive analysis for every evidentiary ruling made in summary judgment proceedings, where, as here, they exclude the key opinions of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses and prevent plaintiffs from trying their case to a jury, more than conclusory labels are required. — Osaze v. Aparicio-Gee (2026), slip op., p. 24.