J.S., In re (2021) B301715 B301715; filed 3/2/21. ![[Files/CaseFiles/B301715.PDF]] [Opinion PDF](https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/B301715.PDF) ## Rule excerpts Published Discussion C: 2021 case-specific further inquiry following ancestry.com results, with no identified tribe or geographic region. Filed March 2, 2021; modified and partially published April 1, 2021. This page 43 passage was unchanged. > To the extent that Rita’s information constituted “reason to believe that an Indian child is [or may be] involved,” the Department conducted an adequate and proper investigation under section 224.2, subdivision (e). Father’s information came from Rita. Rita told the Department that her family came to the United States in 1917 and that she does not know of any tribe associated with her family. Rita had no other information, and there were no other paternal relatives identified. To the extent required, the Department conducted an adequate and proper further inquiry under section 224.2, subdivision (e). — J.S., In re (2021) B301715, slip op., p. 43.