H.B., In re (2023) B322472 B322472; filed 6/20/23. ![[Files/CaseFiles/B322472.PDF]] [Opinion PDF](https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/B322472.PDF) ## Rule excerpts Case-specific ICWA inquiry ruling after the agency expanded its inquiry, contacted every identified likely source, and sought unavailable contact information. > In short, the Department inquired about Indian ancestry with representatives from both sides of two generational levels of H.B.’s family. It contacted every person its interviewees identified as a likely source of information about ancestry. The juvenile court had an adequate basis on which to conclude the Department fulfilled its inquiry obligations under section 224.2, subdivision (b), and that neither the Department nor the court had reason to know or believe that H.B. is an Indian child. — H.B., In re (2023) B322472, slip op., p. 12.