C.S., In re (2022) B312003 B312003; filed 6/13/22. ![[Files/CaseFiles/B312003.PDF]] [Opinion PDF](https://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/archive/B312003.PDF) ## Rule excerpts Custody exit order: the court ordered visitation and fixed its frequency and duration; only the safe starting time was entrusted to the therapist. Filed June 13, 2022; publication ordered June 30, 2022. > Neither C.S. nor her therapist had a veto power over visitation with Cashanda. As discussed, the juvenile court ordered visits were to occur and prescribed how frequently and for how long. The therapist’s only role, as in In re Chantal S., was to decide when it was safe for visits to begin: The limited nature of that discretion is the same as it was in In re Chantal S. — C.S., In re (2022) B312003, slip op., p. 13.